You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

FrameBenignly comments on Request for suggestions: ageing and data-mining - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: bokov 24 November 2014 11:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (48)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: FrameBenignly 25 November 2014 05:18:57AM 1 point [-]

I would expect gene therapy to be the most likely field to have a major breakthrough in this area. The cost of genome sequencing has been falling rapidly. Although finding associations between genetic disorders and aging might be useless today, they could become quite critical in 10 years. That's where I would focus your search.

Comment author: Andy_McKenzie 25 November 2014 09:29:25PM 2 points [-]

Quite possibly, see the work of Maria Konovalenko in this area. However, this is not an easy path and is far, far more dependent on technology to safely introduce genes to cells within tissues in the body than knowledge of which genes to target. Consider that there are many diseases for which the causative genes have been known for some time, yet this has not yet been used successfully for almost all of them.

Comment author: drethelin 26 November 2014 08:28:50PM 0 points [-]

That technology pretty much exists already, its just extremely under-advertised for various reasons.