You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TheOtherDave comments on Integral versus differential ethics - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 01 December 2014 06:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 01 December 2014 07:17:26PM 1 point [-]

(nods) That said, "integral thinking" is difficult to apply consistently to thought-experimental systems as completely divorced from anything like my actual life as TvDS.

I find in practice that when I try, I mostly just end up ignoring the posited constraints of the thought-experimental system -- what is sometimes called "fighting the hypothetical" around here.

For example, when I try to apply "integral thinking" to TvDS to reject the unintuitive conclusion, I end up applying intuitions developed from life in a world with a conceivable number of humans, where my confidence that the suffering I induce will alleviate a greater amount of suffering elsewhere is pretty low, to a thought-experimental world with an inconceivable number of humans where my confidence is extremely high.