You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Kindly comments on Integral versus differential ethics - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 01 December 2014 06:04PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (44)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Kindly 03 December 2014 07:59:39PM 2 points [-]

Why are the small steps necessary? Axiom 1 is sufficient to add an arbitrarily large population of minimally-happy people. If you think that this is repugnant, then you should not assume Axiom 1.

(You then need Axiom 2 to get from the state of "tiny-but-happy A, plus huge and minimally happy B" to a state of uniform minimal happiness. But I don't think that changes much, except that if you're imagining yourself as living in A you might selfishly prefer to remain very happy.)

I apologize for engaging with the example rather than the thesis.