You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jimrandomh comments on A hypothetical question for investors - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: bokov 03 December 2014 04:39PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (32)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: jimrandomh 03 December 2014 06:32:00PM 4 points [-]

This problem is underspecified unless you tell us something about what the days will be like. Suppose the crystal ball tells you exactly what the day's closing price will be (ie, a probability distribution function concentrated on one value).

In world A, you have $1k, and on 99% of days, the market will go up by $3, and on 1% of days it will go down by $3. You should always stay in stock, even if this will cause you to lose more than the transaction fee, because you'll end up paying a second transaction fee on the next day, which the crystal ball didn't tell you about.

In world B, you have $1k, on 99% of days the market will go down by $3, and on 1% of days it will go up by $3. You should always stay in cash, even if this will cause you to pass up more than the transaction fee, because you'll end up paying a second transaction fee on the next day, which the crystal ball didn't tell you about.

Comment author: D_Alex 11 December 2014 09:03:06AM 0 points [-]

The problem is underspecified in a more fundamental way: It does not tell you what to optimise!

One needs to specify both the parameter (eg. expected value) and the time (eg. after 1000 days).