You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Capla comments on Good things to have learned.... - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: NancyLebovitz 03 December 2014 07:29PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (55)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Capla 03 December 2014 10:51:24PM 4 points [-]

Why? Would an understanding of physics help you now, or is it more for fun?

Comment author: IlyaShpitser 04 December 2014 02:13:52AM *  7 points [-]

Physics is math that touches the ground. Not only do you avoid the temptation to muck around with "inaccessible cardinals" and things like that, but I get the impression good physicists can just work out a lot of things from first principles.

Physicists have an excellent nose for modeling too.


edit: I don't think knowing more physics would "help me" now, in the sense that I don't need to know more physics to write papers. But I think knowing more physics would help my intellectual development a lot. I am working on it...

I am not sure my experience generalizes, I certainly am not advocating studying physics as a universal piece of advice.

Comment author: hamiltonianurst 05 December 2014 10:32:26PM 2 points [-]

As a physicist, I'd like to say that if you're tempted by inaccessible cardinals, you will still end up mucking about with them, much to the annoyance of some of your cohort.