You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

peter_hurford comments on PSA: Eugine_Nier evading ban? - Less Wrong Discussion

17 Post author: Dahlen 07 December 2014 11:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: peter_hurford 08 December 2014 05:58:03PM *  3 points [-]

I also think it was wrong / overly risky to write this up publicly, unless you've contacted moderators personally first and found them unresponsive.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 08 December 2014 09:35:44PM 8 points [-]

unless you've contacted moderators personally first and found them unresponsive

I admit that this pretty much happened, only instead of "unresponsive" it was "responded, but then did nothing". :(

See also this.

Comment author: peter_hurford 09 December 2014 01:27:29AM 3 points [-]

Fair enough. Sorry then.

Comment author: Dahlen 08 December 2014 06:22:56PM *  8 points [-]

Alright, but

1) Overly risky for whom? I personally don't feel I have exposed myself to any risk other than vindictive downvoting, and if that happens (it hasn't yet) I trust that the resulting karma issues won't affect my participation much.

2) As far as I know LW doesn't have a well set-up report & moderation system. I even searched for the official rules of conduct and only found a page on what people should not talk about (not on how they should behave generally, or the policy for bans and banned members). I don't remember seeing a list of all the mods on LW or which of them is currently online. Even Viliam Bur said here that it might take even mods a long time to get to the bottom of such an issue.

3) Some people who have an interest in knowing this (e.g. people who have been the targets of mass downvoting) might have been duped otherwise, and I view this as an intrinsically bad thing.

Comment author: peter_hurford 09 December 2014 01:26:14AM 1 point [-]

Overly risky for whom?

For being wrong.

-

As far as I know LW doesn't have a well set-up report & moderation system. [...] I don't remember seeing a list of all the mods on LW or which of them is currently online.

That's true, and fair.

Comment author: Dahlen 09 December 2014 01:42:30AM *  2 points [-]

For being wrong.

That's not a person. Again, who is being put at risk?

Comment author: peter_hurford 09 December 2014 02:41:40AM 9 points [-]
  • The counterfactual u/Azathoth123 in the worlds where u/Azathoth123 and Eugine_Nier are different people.
  • The entire LW community, should this turn into a witchhunt (which it didn't).