You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jaibot comments on Open thread, Dec. 8 - Dec. 15, 2014 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Gondolinian 08 December 2014 12:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (289)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jaibot 08 December 2014 06:19:52AM 0 points [-]

All of the organisms descended from a most recent common ancestor; we pick the MRCA semi-arbitrarily based on criteria like "sexual compatibility of descendents".

Comment author: sixes_and_sevens 08 December 2014 01:52:26PM 4 points [-]

we pick the MRCA semi-arbitrarily based on criteria like "sexual compatibility of descendents".

"I know we're both humpback whales, but he's nowhere near as adventurous as I'd like him to be..."

Comment author: solipsist 08 December 2014 11:05:55AM *  1 point [-]

I think species can be paraphyletic. If we sent a family of llamas into outer space and they evolved into Space Llamas, there would be no common ancestor which included all terrestrial L. glamas but excluded L. astrollama.

Comment author: Romashka 09 December 2014 02:01:57PM 0 points [-]

And there are groups (like oribatid mites) where parthenogenesis is very common. No sex at all, though males occur. (Here's a challenge: you think of anything common among vertebrates, then look for invertebrates (including single-cellular animals) for whom it's not common. The sea-dwellers are very good for this search.)

Some people would tell you that only Homo sapiens exists as a species. Suppose a 'species' exists as a set of disjointed populations, which will never meet each other (or the probability of it happening is so much smaller than of them going extinct)...

Comment author: tut 08 December 2014 01:54:12PM 0 points [-]

No, that's a clade or a monophyletic taxon. Most species are clades, but as solipsist points out not all species are necessarily clades, and most clades are not species.

Comment author: gjm 09 December 2014 04:42:18PM -1 points [-]

No, it's more specific because of based on criteria like "sexual compatibility of descendants".

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 December 2014 03:01:04PM 0 points [-]

There are various genetic issues that make individuals sterile. We don't say that they are suddenly another species just because they are sterile and thus not sexually compatilbe.