You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Punoxysm comments on Harper's Magazine article on LW/MIRI/CFAR and Ethereum - Less Wrong Discussion

44 Post author: gwern 12 December 2014 08:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (153)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 13 December 2014 12:05:41AM *  6 points [-]

I'm curious what the goal of communicating with this journalist was. News organizations get paid by the pageview, so they have an incentive to sell a story, not spread the truth. And journalists also are famous for misrepresenting the people and topics they cover. (Typically when I read something in the press that discusses a topic I know about, they almost always get it a little wrong and often get it a lot wrong. I'm not the only one; this has gotten discussed on Hacker News. In fact, I think it might be interesting to start a "meta-journalism" organization that would find big stories in the media, talk to the people who were interviewed, and get direct quotes from them on if/how they were misrepresented.) If media exposure is a goal, you don't work with random journalists who come to you telling you that they want to include you in stories. You hire a publicist or PR firm that does the reverse and takes your story to journalists and makes sure they present it accurately.

Comment author: Punoxysm 13 December 2014 12:42:22AM *  7 points [-]

So would you suggest we only read PR-firm-generated articles to get the "real story"?

More direct answer: Not talking to journalists allows them to represent you however they want, along with the "refused to comment". Talking at least gets your own words in.

I also don't see anything clearly unethical in this article's journalism.

Comment author: ChristianKl 13 December 2014 07:43:32PM *  5 points [-]

Not talking to journalists allows them to represent you however they want, along with the "refused to comment".

In a case like LW there's also enough material online that a journalist can simply quote you if he wants to do so.

The worst mainstream media article in which I'm quoted didn't have the journalist who wrote the article speaking to me.