You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

chaosmage comments on Harper's Magazine article on LW/MIRI/CFAR and Ethereum - Less Wrong Discussion

44 Post author: gwern 12 December 2014 08:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (153)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kawoomba 14 December 2014 09:58:47AM *  5 points [-]

Yet his readers will form an opinion, and you bet that's gonna be their opinion til kingdom come.

The connoisseur of literature in me appreciates his menagerie of the strange elephant men, his collection of curios.

But the consequentialist in me is pissed off. (#RiddickQuotesInUnlikelyPlaces)

Comment author: chaosmage 14 December 2014 11:08:15AM 3 points [-]

That makes sense. I'd only add that the readers will probably form a range of opinions, not all have one opinion, as you appear to suggest.

But anyone's attention is limited, and it naturally goes to what they're unfamiliar with. When you, as one in the know, read that article, many of the rationalist talking points were familiar to you and didn't register much. A reader new to this would use up much of his/her attention on those parts, and less on mundane things like body shapes.