You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Gondolinian comments on [Short, Meta] Should open threads be more frequent? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Metus 18 December 2014 11:41PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Gondolinian 19 December 2014 12:17:44AM *  3 points [-]

Just an idea: We could post them as needed based on the number of comments in the current thread. I would think ~200 would be a good threshold. We could always lower or raise the threshold later.

ETA: I see that this could be a problem for people if the thread got to say 190 and no one wanted to post for fear of getting drowned out. However, we could have a deadline for reaching the threshold, which if exceeded, would simply start a new thread. For example, if we had a deadline of one week, it would be no worse than the current OT situation, but it might be better if the threshold were crossed earlier.