You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

CBHacking comments on Letting it go: when you shouldn't respond to someone who is wrong - Less Wrong Discussion

7 [deleted] 19 December 2014 03:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (34)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: CBHacking 23 December 2014 12:46:27PM -1 points [-]

Sorry, are you seeking to correct my mistaken impression, or was "implied" just a poor word choice? "Suggested" may have been better; I didn't mean to indicate a high-confidence conclusion but rather that it was the impression I got at the time. Your explanation makes sense but it wasn't apparent to me from your and the OP's comments in this thread alone, and I didn't know anything about your past except that there probably was history between you.

I'm trying to learn how to signal the actual degree to which I support a statement. I can't tell if you're saying that "no, it doesn't imply that" (presumably using "imply" in the logical, "A implies B" sense), which would mean I screwed up by using the word "imply" where I didn't mean to indicate a strong conclusion. Alternatively you may have just meant "no, that conclusion is incorrect" (in which case I would have omitted the first sentence, but that could be stylistic choice).

Comment author: Lumifer 23 December 2014 04:04:39PM 1 point [-]

Well, if we are going to be that precise, I have to admit that my "actually, no" wasn't exactly accurate. That the fact of engagement here implies defensiveness is, generally speaking, true. It's just happens to be not true in my particular case about which I had privileged information (being able to peek inside my head) and you didn't.

So your "implied" was a fine word choice and I don't think there was a way for you to figure out beforehand that your conclusion will turn out to be incorrect.

Comment author: CBHacking 24 December 2014 07:44:54AM 0 points [-]

Thanks for clarifying, and I apologize for getting on your case about it.

Comment author: Lumifer 24 December 2014 04:29:23PM 0 points [-]

Not a problem :-)