You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Mark_Friedenbach comments on Ethereum creator Vitalik Buterin mentions LessWrong, discusses the various camps and ideologies in Cryptocurrency development - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: Ander 31 December 2014 10:23PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (27)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 02 January 2015 05:14:18AM *  1 point [-]

Anything with a use has value to a person benefiting from that use. The trick is to make it such that out-of-band payments to specific miners are not likely to occur.

That's not to say that it's absolutely, 100% a priori impossible to have a "useful but no-value" proof of work. Only theorized example I know of is time-lock decryption: you have a deterministic process for generating public keys, and the proof of work solution is the recovered private key. However this invalidates other assumptions that are required of a secure proof of work, at least with all existing public key crypto systems.