You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Alsadius comments on What does being x% on board with the program of a movement mean? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Sarunas 05 January 2015 09:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alsadius 06 January 2015 09:21:16PM *  0 points [-]

Fair point. I think I just mentally filed that under the weighting algorithm - nobody talks about banning murder, so it'd have a low weight for just about any group out there.

As a ballpark algorithm, weight = importance * controversialness?

Comment author: 9eB1 08 January 2015 09:21:04PM 1 point [-]

The small percent that people say they don't agree with is almost always the most controversial opinions. I suspect that such a weighting isn't what people have in mind when they say they agree with a group 9X%.

Comment author: Alsadius 09 January 2015 05:12:34AM 0 points [-]

Fair, but most controversial doesn't always mean most important. Usually, the narrative is something like "All the hard slogging that this movement has done has been awesome - it's changed society for the better. But now they're overreaching" - I can see that aligning(seriously, not just for rhetorical weight) with a belief that the group is really about the sloggy stuff, and the goes-too-far stuff is just a novel addition that isn't core to its beliefs. That seems to be what Aaronson meant, and also most others I've seen use similar phrasing.