Alsadius comments on What does being x% on board with the program of a movement mean? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (15)
Fair point. I think I just mentally filed that under the weighting algorithm - nobody talks about banning murder, so it'd have a low weight for just about any group out there.
As a ballpark algorithm, weight = importance * controversialness?
The small percent that people say they don't agree with is almost always the most controversial opinions. I suspect that such a weighting isn't what people have in mind when they say they agree with a group 9X%.
Fair, but most controversial doesn't always mean most important. Usually, the narrative is something like "All the hard slogging that this movement has done has been awesome - it's changed society for the better. But now they're overreaching" - I can see that aligning(seriously, not just for rhetorical weight) with a belief that the group is really about the sloggy stuff, and the goes-too-far stuff is just a novel addition that isn't core to its beliefs. That seems to be what Aaronson meant, and also most others I've seen use similar phrasing.