You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

emr comments on What does being x% on board with the program of a movement mean? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Sarunas 05 January 2015 09:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (15)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: emr 07 January 2015 03:28:28AM 0 points [-]

Are there examples of movements that intentionally restrict their set of positions?

I'm thinking perhaps of groups that want to distance themselves from a less popular group, even when that group would support the more popular group; e.g. advocates for a single-payer health care system in the US might try to avoid making too many general claims in order to not appear socialist.

Also: I realize this is separate from what you're analyzing, but it seems clear that these claims mostly serve to prepare the audience for an upcoming critique, and fend off certain negative responses and misidentification that can easily be triggered by criticism. So in Scott's post, you see a few sections of overt (over-the-top?) support for in-group positions on different issues, even when those issues aren't (logically) very related to his main point.