You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JoshuaZ comments on Exams and Overfitting - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: robot-dreams 06 January 2015 07:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (47)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 07 January 2015 03:15:03AM 1 point [-]

So where is the line? Can you maybe give examples of what would seem to be unacceptable degrees of making connections for an exam in an intro level course?

Comment author: gwillen 07 January 2015 10:00:10AM *  3 points [-]

I once had a physics professor (with a reputation for being tough) give an exam problem which required some slightly unusual calculus trick which -- though surely covered in a prerequisite math course -- had never been used anywhere else in the physics course. [I unfortunately don't remember the details; this would have been ~2004.] It was something I think most people in the class would not have had a problem with in isolation. But in the context of the exam, under time pressure, it just wasn't something that came to mind to try. The professor subsequently expressed confusion about why everybody in the class bombed that question, since it only involved doing things which -- in isolation -- we should all have been able to do.

I don't think I'd call the question "unacceptable", but I think the professor's mystification reflected an unfortunate misjudgment about how hard it is to think creatively under time pressure.