You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

SanguineEmpiricist comments on Comments on "When Bayesian Inference Shatters"? - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: Crystalist 07 January 2015 10:56PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (31)
Tags: inference bayesian

Comments (31)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: SanguineEmpiricist 08 January 2015 08:19:48PM *  0 points [-]

I refuse to entertain the idea that bayesian should be called what it is and not inverse probability. Bayesians ego's are overinflated on their own hot air. Kolmogorov comes first.

Protocols of Anti-Bayes:

http://vserver1.cscs.lsa.umich.edu/~crshalizi/weblog/601.html

http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aos/1176349830

http://vserver1.cscs.lsa.umich.edu/~crshalizi/notebooks/bayesian-consistency.html

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF00535479

and how could I forget this masterpiece?

http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1382&context=philosophy

Comment author: RichardKennaway 09 January 2015 01:15:19PM 1 point [-]

What do you think of this and this?

Comment author: SanguineEmpiricist 09 January 2015 11:03:59PM 1 point [-]

Yes I have read those. The Judea Pearl part of my standard showpiece. I love See Gelman's blog and Mayo's older book or perhaps recent book further criticisms. Gelman has collaborated with Mayo and Cosma.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit