You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Luke_A_Somers comments on Explaining “map and territory” and “fundamental attribution error” to a broad audience - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Gleb_Tsipursky 09 January 2015 05:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (13)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Luke_A_Somers 09 January 2015 08:48:34PM *  2 points [-]

The Landmark Forum is done in-person. They rather make a point to not doing their stuff in other media to avoid IP headaches, since they're explicitly for-profit, not mainly in it to raise the sanity waterline (though I expect they would like that too).

Other examples of story are, say, dealing with rejection (for a job, for a role, romantically, even simply declining to join an event) by remembering that it was probably due to contingent local factors and even if it wasn't it probably isn't personal... avoiding Learned Helplessness... basically getting to be more comfortable with not knowing rather than making something up, especially unpleasant things.

Story wasn't usually applied to taking off the rose-colored glasses, though it could be.

Heh. I remember they had lots of people saying they were a cult for equally stupid reasons, but the accusations were even more hyperbolic than the accusations LW has received. Not a single one of them applied to anything I experienced there.

Comment author: Gleb_Tsipursky 10 January 2015 04:07:48AM 1 point [-]

Thanks for sharing those ideas! I'll put the examples you suggested of the Story into the pool of content that we use at Intentional Insights to write the blog posts, much appreciated!

I'm not aware of LW being called a cult, sad to learn that there are some people who do that. Oh well, such is life.