You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Elo comments on Optimal eating (or rather, a step in the right direction) - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: c_edwards 19 January 2015 01:35AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (65)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Elo 21 January 2015 05:40:42AM 1 point [-]

Requesting a source for this. I was aware of some mercury in fish, but to my understanding the levels were around about - "its okay to eat 3 serves of fish per week without worrying about it" (this includes salmon and tuna)

and "if you eat 7+ serves of fish a week, you might want to check your metal poisoning levels after about two years"

I would like to be wrong; but I have no sources for this.

Comment author: Lumifer 21 January 2015 04:01:04PM 2 points [-]

This is, unfortunately, complex -- the levels of mercury in fish depend on the kind of fish and where it was caught. So a study of, say, tuna in Tsukiji (Tokyo's fish market) will tell you nothing about the mercury content of your sardines and vice versa. You can estimate averages, but the error bars are going to be pretty big.