You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

PhilGoetz comments on Superintelligence 29: Crunch time - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: KatjaGrace 31 March 2015 04:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 01 April 2015 03:25:57AM *  4 points [-]

An important form of strategic analysis is the search for crucial considerations. (p257) Crucial consideration: idea with the potential to change our views substantially, e.g. reversing the sign of the desirability of important interventions. (p257)

Yes, but... a "crucial consideration" is then an idea that runs counter to answers we already feel certain about to important questions. This means that we should not just be open-minded, but should specially seek out other opinions on the matters we are most confident about.

How can you do this without being obliged to consider what seem to you like crackpot theories?