= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Luke_A_Somers comments on Superintelligence 23: Coherent extrapolated volition - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (97)
Not necessarily. If A was a Nash equilibrium while B was a Pareto improvement from that but the second society couldn't coordinate to achieve it, then they could gaze wistfully into the past, say they had fallen, and be right to do so.
Yes, necessarily, if A and B are sets of moral values, not the degree to which they are attained. You're interpreting A and B as, say, wealth or power distributions.
Hmmm. Yes. But I don't know that you would actually be able to find examples of A and B in real life.