You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

evand comments on Astronomy, space exploration and the Great Filter - Less Wrong Discussion

23 Post author: JoshuaZ 19 April 2015 07:26PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: evand 20 April 2015 02:09:05PM 2 points [-]

Are you saying Dyson spheres are inefficient as computational substrate, as power collection, or both?

Because to me it looks like what you actually want is a Dyson sphere / swarm of solar collectors, powering a computer further out.

Comment author: jacob_cannell 20 April 2015 04:45:12PM 0 points [-]

A huge swarm/sphere of solar collectors uses up precious materials (silicon, etc) that are far more valuable to use in ultimate compact reversible computers - which don't need much energy to sustain anyway.

Comment author: Jan_Rzymkowski 21 April 2015 07:27:18PM 0 points [-]

You seem to be bottomlining. Earlier you gave cold reversible-computing civs reasonable probability (and doubt), now you seem to treat it as an almost sure scenario for civ developement.

Comment author: jacob_cannell 21 April 2015 11:34:47PM 0 points [-]

No I don't see it as a sure scenario, just one that has much higher probability mass than dyson spheres. Compact, cold structures are far more likely than large hot constructions - due to speed of light and thermodynamic considerations.