But if you make systematic mistakes in thinking, you will only be making them faster.
But you can get away with more mistakes, if you can loop your test and improve cycle to fix those mistakes.
There was a demo that really brought this home to me. Some robotic fingers dribbling a ping pong ball at blinding speed. Fast cameras, fast actuators, brute force stupid feedback calculations. Stupid can be good enough if you're fast enough.
For more human creative processes, speeding up the design/test/evaluate loop will often beat more genius. Many things aren't to be reasoned out as much tested out.
I have this intuition that higher intelligence "unlocks" some options, and then it depends on the speed how much many points you get from the unlocked options. For example, if you have a ping-pong-playing robot with insane speed, such robot could easily win any ping-pong tournament. But still couldn't conquer the world, for example. His intelligence only unlocks the area of playing ping-pong. If the intelligence is not general, making it faster still doesn't make it general.
For general intelligences, if we ignore the time and resources, the great...
From Scott Adams Blog
The article really is about speeding up government, but the key point is speed as a component of smart:
This shifts the focus from the ability to grasp and think through very complex topics (includes good working memory and memory recall in general) to the ability new topics quickly (includes quick learning and unlearning, creativity).
This also changes the type of grit needed. The grit to push through a long topic versus the grit try lots of new things and to learn from failures.