You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Velorien comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, January 2015, chapter 103 - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: b_sen 29 January 2015 01:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (173)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 12 February 2015 02:46:27PM *  1 point [-]

It seems transparent to me that the whole thing with the cloak was a gambit to manipulate Harry.

Of course, I understand that part. It's not really the point. My point is that at all other times he seems to do his manipulations by misleading without lying.

Another example: the note about the escape-out-of-Hogwarts portkey, which Dumbledore later admitted to have written (and now that I checked, he admitted to writing both). In it, he misleadingly suggests the portkey leads to the Salem's Witches' institute without actually saying so. (Quirrel picked up on that for Harry).

Comment author: Velorien 12 February 2015 09:02:32PM 0 points [-]

The Salem Witches' Institute in America accepts boys as well, despite the name. They are good people and would protect you even from Dumbledore, if you needed it. Britain holds that you need Dumbledore's permission to emigrate to magical America, but magical America disagrees. So in the final extremity, get outside the wards of Hogwarts and tear in half the King of Hearts from this deck of cards.

What does the "so" at the start of the last sentence mean, if it does not connect the tearing of the card to the preceding statements about the Salem Witches' Institute?

Comment author: ChristianKl 13 February 2015 02:18:30PM 0 points [-]

It's possible that going to the house in London is simply a step on the way to the Salem Witches' Institute.