You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lumifer comments on February 2015 Media Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: ArisKatsaris 01 February 2015 11:03AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (138)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lumifer 02 February 2015 06:38:09PM *  1 point [-]

Putin might rationally calculate that if he tried to conquer Finland (which used to be part of the Czarist Empire) there is only a 10% chance that the U.S. would put up serious resistance

Well, first the Finns are likely to put up serious resistance. There a reason why Finland was an independent country post-WW2 and not the 16th Soviet republic.

The "logical" next targets for Putin are the Baltics.

Comment author: James_Miller 02 February 2015 06:46:02PM 3 points [-]

The "logical" next targets for Putin are the Baltics.

But the Baltic states are in NATO, and so the U.S. is more likely to defend them than it would Finland.

Comment author: Lumifer 02 February 2015 07:02:29PM 2 points [-]

Whether US and Europe are more likely to go to war with Russia over Finland or over the Baltics is an interesting question, but there doesn't appear to be any way of deciding it :-)

Comment author: James_Miller 02 February 2015 07:12:38PM 1 point [-]

NATO is a point in favor of the U.S. being more likely to fight over the Baltics than Finland. Are there any factors going the other way?

Comment author: Lumifer 02 February 2015 07:15:19PM *  3 points [-]

Yes. The Baltics belonged to Russia much more recently than Finland and have a much larger Russian minority population.

Comment author: James_Miller 02 February 2015 07:18:28PM 2 points [-]

Good point.