= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
asd comments on I played as a Gatekeeper and came pretty close to losing in a couple of occasions. Logs and a brief recap inside. - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d){kind=logo}
Comments (46)
Even the real person in this situation can lie, can't he?
The AI could simply point out that 0 and 1 are not probabilities, and now by lying you've given the AI the intellectual high ground.
Yes, but the gatekeeper may be acting several levels deep in a roleplay (roleplaying a character roleplaying another character roleplaying...etc) to pass the time and avoid emitting evidence that might allow the AI to pinpoint his preferences. The currently active character may have one of a rather large number of responses to this besides actually being more mentally pliable as a result of a loss of face (or may not even view the dialogue as a loss of face.)
It amuses me that publishing this comment will make it more challenging to implement this strategy if I elect to play as Gatekeeper again at some point in the future.
Well, to nitpick I am certain that I exist (cogito) with P(1).
Well, my confidence that I exist exceeds my confidence that probability makes sense.
If the gatekeeper really believed that he would just shut off the machine.