You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MathiasZaman comments on The morality of disclosing salary requirements - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: PhilGoetz 08 February 2015 09:12PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (39)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: MathiasZaman 11 February 2015 08:01:14AM 3 points [-]

Isn't that part of a generalized problem where hiring processes test how well people do at hiring processes rather than how well they do at the job?

Comment author: gjm 11 February 2015 02:20:53PM 3 points [-]

It is, but I think there's a useful distinction between hiring-process skills that are related to job skills but not the same (e.g., mathsy problem-solving or programming language trivia, when interviewing for a programming job) and ones that have basically nothing to do with job performance (e.g., how good you are at selling yourself, when interviewing for a programming job).

Measuring the first sort of skill is to some extent a necessary evil. No feasible hiring process is ever going to measure exactly the right things. (Though one can adjust the quantity of evil a bit; e.g., programming language trivia questions are a rotten guide to performance for most programming jobs.)

Measuring the second sort seems more fundamentally unwise.