You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ZankerH comments on Open thread, Feb. 9 - Feb. 15, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: MrMind 09 February 2015 09:12AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (321)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: iarwain1 10 February 2015 02:31:39AM 3 points [-]

I voted yes, but largely because it will probably have very positive effects on my life after the vacation.

Here's my somewhat related question:

I am offering you the possibility to take the world's greatest year-long vacation. Pure enjoyment and happiness, no side effects or risks. However, when you're finished I'm going to give you this pill here that will make you completely forget the entire thing, and will also completely remove any possible subconscious or physiological benefit you might have otherwise gotten from the vacation. For that matter, for all you know you may have already taken the vacation and the pill and you've just forgotten about it.

Don't like that idea? Well, if you want an alternative I can give you a half-decent one day vacation instead. Not so great, no great life-changing experiences or lifelong memories, but at least you'll probably enjoy it and you will remember it when you're finished.

Which do you prefer?

Submitting...

Comment author: ZankerH 10 February 2015 09:13:34AM 4 points [-]

Even all else being equal, I'd prefer not to waste one year of my life on something I won't even remember afterwards.

Comment author: Dagon 10 February 2015 03:27:17PM 8 points [-]

Doesn't that describe all of life? Why waste <n> years of your life on something you won't even remember afterwards?

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 11 February 2015 09:40:31PM *  3 points [-]

I picked the half-decent vacation because I assumed iarwain1 was talking about forgetting the great vacation immediately (i.e. within hours) after it's over; if I had to take the pill several decades later I would have picked the great vacation.

(This means that how much an experience matters to me depends on how long I will remember it, rather than just on whether it ever happened at all and/or on whether I will remember it at t = +∞. Does this have some serious badly counterintuitive consequence that I'm missing?)

Comment author: wadavis 11 February 2015 04:39:46PM 2 points [-]

Many philosophies of life fall apart on the cosmic macro scale. Lets not move the goalpost into post-transhumanism, it is clear that is not what ZankerH is talking about.

Comment author: ZankerH 10 February 2015 06:25:18PM 1 point [-]

What are you talking about? I don't have a habit of losing memory after long-term activities, and I'm pretty sure that's normal.

Comment author: ChristianKl 10 February 2015 06:45:20PM 5 points [-]

Death.

Comment author: Dagon 10 February 2015 08:36:35PM 1 point [-]

I think you'll lose all your memories sometime in the relatively near future (say, less than 100 years).