You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vaniver comments on Quotes Repository - Less Wrong Discussion

1 Post author: Dorikka 10 February 2015 04:36AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (87)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 10 February 2015 07:47:57PM 1 point [-]

Spaced repetition theory suggests that it's quite useful to repeat important things that people say.

So, I think that having each LW page pull a quote from the Best Of Rationality Quotes and put it somewhere would be neat; also, we could have links to the featured articles from the Main Page on every page, so that more people will see them (and it will serve more like the Sequences Rerun). I don't think we really need to have the same thing in many places, instead of pointing to it many times; if I post Yvain's best quotes every month, that gets me a lot of karma I don't really deserve. If, every month, I find five external rationality quotes that haven't been posted here in the years and years of monthly rationality quotes, then that gets me a lot of karma that I do deserve. (And seeing things on an actual spaced repetition schedule is likely better than seeing them as frequently as people decide to repost them.)

The rule in this thread allows quotes from Scott.

I believe this has come up and the consensus (or, at least, my position) was that quotes by Scott should not be allowed in the Rationality Quotes thread.

Comment author: ChristianKl 10 February 2015 08:06:25PM 1 point [-]

if I post Yvain's best quotes every month, that gets me a lot of karma I don't really deserve.

It's not about posting quotes of third parties that Yvain posted in the quotes thread but choosing quotes from his other writing. Making specific choices about what of his long articles is quote worthy is a decision that adds value.

I don't think we really need to have the same thing in many places, instead of pointing to it many times;

Quoting writing often means to make a choice to select certain passages of writing over other passages. It's not just repeating the same thing.

I believe this has come up and the consensus (or, at least, my position) was that quotes by Scott should not be allowed in the Rationality Quotes thread.

This isn't directly the Rationality Quotes thread and as we are starting a new thread, it's worth to be clear about it's rules.

Comment author: Gondolinian 11 February 2015 12:23:40PM *  0 points [-]

Making specific choices about what of his long articles is quote worthy is a decision that adds value.

Perhaps we could have an irregular thread for doing just that and trying to find the best passages from LW and peripheral rationality sites?

ETA: Maybe we could also try a thread for summarizing long articles with or without direct quotes?

Comment author: ChristianKl 11 February 2015 12:27:27PM 0 points [-]

I did a while ago open such a thread and the amount of contribution it got was relatively low. I don't see a reason to have the thread separate from this thread.