You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Xerographica comments on Is Pragmatarianism (Tax Choice) Less Wrong? - Less Wrong Discussion

-16 Post author: Xerographica 12 February 2015 04:47AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (68)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Xerographica 14 February 2015 01:31:34AM 0 points [-]

Sorry about that. I made my point poorly. What Epictetus was doing to pragmatarianism is exactly what I would want him to do to any government plan. It should be just as difficult for the government to implement any of its plan as it is for me to implement my plan. It's great to have more, rather than less, people inspecting a plan for problems. According to Linus's Law... given enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow. Allowing people to choose where their taxes go would put a lot of eyeballs in the public sector.

Regarding your second point... it's addressed by the comment where I brought up the example of putting a man on the moon. Also, wouldn't you guess that there'd be less demand fluctuations with the public than with presidents or congress? The public really doesn't switch back and forth between conservative and liberal like presidents and congress do. I'd think that, for the most part, the aggregate demand for most things would be a lot steadier than the "demand" we get from our seesaw government.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 14 February 2015 07:35:26PM *  0 points [-]

I don't think Linus's law applies here, since that's with areas like programming where a) the eyeballs are experts and b) it is close unambiguous once a bug has been found that it is a bug.

Also, wouldn't you guess that there'd be less demand fluctuations with the public than with presidents or congress? The public really doesn't switch back and forth between conservative and liberal like presidents and congress do.

This is a really good point and seems like the strongest argument for your proposal.