You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

polymathwannabe comments on The outline of Maletopia - Less Wrong Discussion

3 [deleted] 19 February 2015 12:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (86)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: polymathwannabe 21 February 2015 12:31:25AM 2 points [-]

there's a logical inconsistency in giving people 3000 years ago credit for the rationality of their views on lepers and pork, but condemning them for having irrational views on homosexuality

It's not inconsistent to acknowledge the occasional rightness of a stopped clock.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 21 February 2015 01:07:38AM *  3 points [-]

It's inconsistent to call ideas about the transmission of homosexuality "superstition" because they turned out to be wrong (if they did; I don't know the research), yet not call ideas about the transmission of leprosy "superstition", just because they turned out to be right. The people at that time had roughly equal reason to believe either proposition. Detection of the transmission of leprosy is extremely hard to detect, so much so that for much of the 20th century, doctors said it was not transmissible.

I think his claim is that people are illicitly labeling people who disagree with their values as irrational.

Comment author: skeptical_lurker 26 February 2015 02:31:13PM 1 point [-]

Ok, so to be logically consistent, if your values are that homosexuality is as bad as leprosy (!) and you believe its contagious, then you isolate the homosexuals, you don't kill them.