You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

SilentCal comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, February 2015, chapter 108 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: b_sen 20 February 2015 09:53PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (352)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: SilentCal 20 February 2015 11:38:05PM 0 points [-]

So far, the important spells get their detail work done. How does the improved horcrux work?

AFAICT all Q's claims of its total novelty are in human speech. It's possible but not certain that his previous Parseltongued comments horcruxes puts a lower bound on how similar they are. It certainly means he's confident his ritual is not the one the legends are about, but given that it ended up suiting the stories better than the weak horcrux, it's quite possible he unknowingly reinvented the true forgotten original. (speculation: this would explain the possible-but-improbable appearance of a sixth-year able to outsmart and kill Baba Yaga)

We know it was expected to make him a disembodied possessor spirit but in fact required the victim to touch an anchor, until augmented with the resurrection stone. We know it requires a murder. We know the user is conscious while residing in the anchors. We also know that the legends it resembles say that it works by tearing the soul.

Comment author: DanArmak 20 February 2015 11:58:05PM 0 points [-]

We also know that the legends it resembles say that it works by tearing the soul.

So far that's the one part that doesn't seem to correspond to anything that's happened.