You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

kilobug comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, February 2015, chapter 109 - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Gondolinian 23 February 2015 08:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (160)

CC Licenced

Comments (160)

Sort By: Best

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: kilobug 24 February 2015 09:34:08AM -1 points [-]

The DADA curse was put by Voldemort itself. Does it affect him ? And can't he lift it ? I wouldn't blame much upon that curse concerning Quirrelmort.

Comment author: Izeinwinter comment score below threshold [+] (4 children)

Comment author: William_Quixote 24 February 2015 01:55:01PM 2 points [-]

This may be true. But we don't know that. If you are saying something that we dot know is true, it should be hedged. If something is true for sure then sound confident, or even better cite a source.

Comment author: Izeinwinter 24 February 2015 03:31:11PM -2 points [-]

I built up an entire theory about the curse after 108 - I may sound more confident about it than is wise, but didn't want to recap the whole thing again as that would just be tiresome. Apologies. Suffice it to say that I currently believe Voldemorts own stolen cup is fucking with him.

It's that or he is for some odd reason plotting his own downfall, because stepping in front of that mirror while under a confundus charm was just.. extremely ill advised.

Comment author: pedanterrific 24 February 2015 09:38:44PM 0 points [-]

Did you ever come up with a response to the point that the Goblet was in Hogwarts for a few centuries after Baba Yaga, before being warehoused at Beauxbatons? If the curse was in effect all that time, it would have been mentioned.

Comment author: Izeinwinter 24 February 2015 10:37:58PM * -1 points [-]

The phrasing is that nothing can be taken from anyone protected by the contract. Not that gifts or trade are forbidden, Which means that if BY drops a note to the effect that she is subcontracting her responsibilities as battle magic teacher into the goblet that particular teacher is granted forbearance. So as long as the goblet was in a place she could get at, no curse.

kilobug comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, February 2015, chapter 109 - Less Wrong Discussion

Article Navigation

Comments (160)

Nearest Meetups

Virtual Study Room

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Recent Open Threads

Recent Rationality Diaries

Recent Wiki Edits

Top Contributors, 30 Days

Recent Karma Awards

Comments (160)

Top Contributors, 30 Days

You'll need to login or register to do that

(Don't worry, it only takes a few seconds)

Create

Login