linkhyrule5 comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, February 2015, chapter 112 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (287)
To be fair to Harry, neither of those are good examples - Voldemort's plan also had Hermione in Azkaban thinking she had murdered Draco Malfoy for two weeks, which would have had... unpleasant effects on her mental health, and there's a pretty sharp limit to how much you can count "going along with a hostage situation at gunpoint" as "meddling." A mistake, yes, intentional meddling, no.
I'm not saying that the alternative was good--just that the alternative was better.
I am considering primarily the earlier mistakes Harry made with respect to Quirrell.
Was it?
I really don't think the alternative was better than the canonical "Harry gets her out of there at a reasonably low cost considering all the myriad ways he has of making tons of money".
I mean, given that his opponent turned out to be Quirrell, maybe, but otherwise...
Which earlier mistakes were these?
The chief of them is the one that Harry realizes:
I think Dumbledore did realize the fact that the Defense Professor is Voldemort, so that's no consequential error on Harry's part.
Did he? The beginning of chapter 110 seems to suggest otherwise:
That's sarcasm.
That precise wording might carry sarcastic undertones. However, the bewilderment right before that seemed (and still seems, on second reading) genuine to me:
It's also an eerie echo of Lucius Malfoy: