You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ChristianKl comments on What subjects are important to rationality, but not covered in Less Wrong? - Less Wrong Discussion

20 Post author: casebash 27 February 2015 11:57AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (66)

Comments (66)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 07 March 2015 04:41:15PM 0 points [-]

In particular, it seems like it is a remarkably unexamined, unplanned attempt.

As far as I see we do have plenty of meta discussion that examine LW.

Comment author: evand 09 March 2015 01:31:46AM 0 points [-]

There is plenty of talk, less data, and only very tiny amounts of tested changes. Surely the rationalist approach to solving a problem like this should involve empirical examination, not just armchair discussions.

Comment author: ChristianKl 09 March 2015 12:00:53PM 0 points [-]

LW isn't very big and as such it's not clear whether there are strong returns to experimenting with software changes.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit