solipsist comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, February 2015, chapter 113 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (503)
Posting write-only. EDIT I am no longer write-only
Recall Harry's transfiguration power:
With this Harry can:
Dumbledore can cast the Patronus wordlessly (chapter 57). Maybe Harry can too, and
Of course, there are lots of solutions if you allow Harry to have done stuff off-camera. "Cedric, if I don't meet you at 11:59 tonight carrying a mayonnaise-infused gerbil, please use your time turner to cause a paradox". Harry could turn into his hitherto unseen animagus form ETA which might be a peregrine falcon, the fastest of birds.
Useful
Evidence we have the Harry doesn't
The Foreshadowed Weasley Loot was invoked - the gun.
I was going to correct you
But then I remembered -- no handguns in Britain! That was a clue I missed right there!
That happened about 1997 after a famous school massacre, but the story is set in 1992. Guns are still available in the UK(though, obviously not so freely as in the US).
Right, so what he actually must asked them for is a gun that was already banned in the UK but not in the U.S.. Maybe one of those ‘assault rifles’?
You think he had two guns in his pouch? I mean, it's not impossible, but it seems unlikely(and if he did, why did he use the lesser gun to shoot at Voldemort?).
Not seriously. I'm just trying to save the beautiful theory (that what the Weasleys' contact had to leave Britain to get was a gun) from the ugly fact (that guns were available in Britain at the time).