You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Douglas_Knight comments on Open thread, Mar. 2 - Mar. 8, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: MrMind 02 March 2015 08:19AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (155)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 04 March 2015 05:47:52PM 1 point [-]

There is a general problem that a commons transitions from abundant to tragic as demand grows. At what point do you introduce some kind of centralized regulation (eg, property rights)? How do you do that?

But space is nowhere near that point. Not worrying about Kessler syndrome is the right answer. And if it were going to be a problem in the foreseeable future, there are very few users of space, so they could easily negotiate a solution. If you expect that in the future every city of a million people will be sovereign with its own space program, then there is more of a tragic commons, but in that scenario space is the least of your problems.

Comment author: G0W51 05 March 2015 04:30:23PM 1 point [-]

I'm not so sure that space around Earth is nowhere near that point. There is a concern that a collision with the single large satellite Envisat could trigger Kessler Syndrome, and "two catalogued objects pass within about 200m of it every year."