You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanArmak comments on March 2015 Media Thread - Less Wrong Discussion

7 Post author: ArisKatsaris 02 March 2015 06:51PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 09 March 2015 06:44:16PM *  -1 points [-]

In your excerpt of "Intelligence: Is it the epidemiologists' elusive 'fundamental cause' of social class inequalities in health?":

As environments get better, genetics explain more of variance; as societies become more meritocratic, they become more unequal.

IOW, as environments get better, they become more uniform (in their effect). Is this saying that environments contribute mostly negative factors, not positive ones, to development, so the best environments affect outcomes least? And if so, how well established is it?