You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jimrandomh comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, March 2015, chapter 114 + chapter 115 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gondolinian 03 March 2015 06:02PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (423)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Diadem 03 March 2015 06:42:02PM *  4 points [-]

Well done Eliezer!

I have read lots and lots of 'partial transfiguration' solutions over the past few days. I didn't really like them, they seemed artificial, unrealistic.

But somehow when you told the solution, it didn't feel artificial at all. It felt like it made sense. And I really liked the way Harry stalled for time as well. A few very nice tricks there.

I'm not sure why Harry went through all the trouble of covering up his involvement though. Is there a reason he doesn't want to to take the credit? Is he afraid it will give away the secret of partial transfiguration? Or perhaps he doesn't want Draco to know he, presumably, killed Lucius? I guess we'll find out tomorrow ;)

Comment author: jimrandomh 03 March 2015 06:47:33PM 10 points [-]

The way he set it up gives Hermione the same credit for defeating Voldemort that Harry got when he was a baby.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 03 March 2015 06:51:56PM 10 points [-]

... which conveniently explains why Hermione has super powers now.

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 03 March 2015 07:03:02PM 7 points [-]

So the Sunshine Regiment gets a Super-Hermione after all.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 03 March 2015 07:50:18PM 15 points [-]

Chaos General gets the Stone, Sunshine General gets superpowers, Dragon General gets No Parents.

Comment author: DanArmak 03 March 2015 09:20:11PM 13 points [-]

So each of them gets more of something they already had.

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 03 March 2015 08:47:21PM *  5 points [-]

Dragon General gets No Parents.

Not even something original. General Chaos already got that Achievement before him.

Comment author: Velorien 03 March 2015 08:58:42PM 10 points [-]

General Chaos would firmly disagree.

Comment author: MarkusRamikin 03 March 2015 09:02:03PM 5 points [-]

Only if Achievements can be revoked. He definitely had that for a short while 11 years earlier.

Comment author: Gabriel 03 March 2015 09:10:59PM 2 points [-]

Nope. He has four parents only two of whom happen to be dead.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 03 March 2015 09:23:57PM 2 points [-]

If you count Quirrell, he has five parents, two and a half of whom happen to be dead. In fact, the half-death of Quirrell brought his Parental Survival Rate down to 0.5, so of course Draco's had to go down to stay ahead of him.

Comment author: Transfuturist 03 March 2015 11:34:01PM *  3 points [-]

Quirrel was his fiance, not his parent.

Comment author: Jost 04 March 2015 09:18:38AM 4 points [-]

They were as close to being soul mates as two humans can possibly be.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 04 March 2015 11:32:17AM 1 point [-]

Oh, right, him and the time turner.

Comment author: Benito 04 March 2015 10:36:29PM -1 points [-]

Wow, inbreeding much? I'm your father and your husband.

Comment author: SilentCal 03 March 2015 08:09:30PM 1 point [-]

Split in some to-be-determined proportion with the deceased Quirrell/Monroe.

Comment author: MathMage 03 March 2015 08:31:54PM 0 points [-]

Unless Dumbledore comes back. Even if he doesn't, Harry has made little effort to prevent people from suspecting that Quirrell was connected to Voldemort.

Comment author: SilentCal 03 March 2015 08:54:47PM 1 point [-]

Hmm... the people who might suspect this are probably few enough to address individually. Did you have anyone in mind who's likely to go public?

Comment author: MathMage 03 March 2015 09:59:32PM 1 point [-]

I...hm. Maybe I was letting hindsight bias me here.