You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MathMage comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, March 2015, chapter 114 + chapter 115 - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: Gondolinian 03 March 2015 06:02PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (423)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: solipsist 04 March 2015 02:26:28AM *  2 points [-]

Professor Quirrell will always be a step ahead of you, will always outwit you. You cannot beat him in any game.

That is the characterization of the Defense Professor. A story cannot start with "You can't beat the Professor Quirrell at any game" and end with "Professor Quirrell has lost the game" without a character break in between.

Comment author: MathMage 04 March 2015 02:51:29AM 4 points [-]

...or character growth in the protagonist, theoretically.

Comment author: solipsist 04 March 2015 03:57:03AM 1 point [-]

Perhaps, but you have to get around why the villain doesn't destroy the growing threat while it's still weak.

Comment author: Velorien 04 March 2015 01:46:15PM 5 points [-]

Which isn't a problem in HPMOR, because we've been given a number of persuasive reasons why Quirrell wanted Harry alive - he didn't change his mind about this until he heard the prophecy about Harry destroying the world, at which point it seems he decided to kill Harry as soon as he'd used him to obtain the Philosopher's Stone.