You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

riparianx comments on Can we talk about mental illness? - Less Wrong Discussion

39 Post author: riparianx 08 March 2015 08:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (108)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: riparianx 09 March 2015 11:25:52PM 1 point [-]

Your english is better than the english of a lot of native speakers.

Well... yeah, online discussion is inefficient. But when you're cut off from the efficient options, you probably shouldn't throw up your hands and give up. I'm not sure if that's what you meant, though.

I think you may be disregarding the viewpoints of others, here. You can't do any efficient self-improvement if you refuse to call your problems what they are. It might feel nice to say "You know what? I'm not mentally ill. I just need to improve myself." I WANT to improve myself. Most people here do. I've hit a roadblock here, and I want to talk to other people that have, or have in the past. I'd like to hear the viewpoints of others. What worked, what didn't, etc. Group therapy/discussions with people with the same problem or similar have been extremely helpful to a lot of people.

Also, "keep it simple, stupid" is only helpful when the problem can be simplified further. Simplifying things is really hard when we don't understand them, and mental illness is one of science's big question marks.

I'm not trying to ad hominem you, and I'm sorry if I came off that way.

Comment author: [deleted] 10 March 2015 12:01:10PM *  -1 points [-]

Your english is better than the english of a lot of native speakers.

I doubt it.

"You know what? I'm not mentally ill. I just need to improve myself."

Who cares about mental illness? There's action and inaction. Action WILL lead to something and if you do it well you'll get GOOD results.. Inaction gets you nothing no matter what you do.

Also, "keep it simple, stupid" is only helpful when the problem can be simplified further.

No, it's always useful and is a good way to think about things in general. Why should things be more complex when they can be simplier? Do you begin with a simple (or rather, minimal) model and later expand on it or just build a complex theory and try it? The time investment, effort, and return are way better on the simple route, the complex route sucks because by the time you do both you WILL get a sharper pencil using the simple way.

You should also remember that complex things are built out of simple things, so you won't be a complex master before you're a simple superhypermegaultragrand-master.

Simplifying things is really hard when we don't understand them, and mental illness is one of science's big question marks.

I think I need anger control.