You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Good_Burning_Plastic comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, March 2015, chapter 117 - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: Gondolinian 08 March 2015 07:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (152)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Good_Burning_Plastic 09 March 2015 01:00:28PM 2 points [-]

Yet it's typically considered worse to murder a very old person than a young adult.

I think that's because the elderly are more likely to be defenceless and murdering someone defenceless is considered bad for virtue ethics reasons. But if you could save either an elder's life or a young adult's life I'd guess most people would say you had better save the latter.

Comment author: gjm 09 March 2015 02:47:07PM *  3 points [-]

It would make me (and perhaps others) a happier person if people saying things like "it's worse to do X than Y" would distinguish between

  • doing X is a greater harm to the world than doing Y, and
  • doing X is better evidence that the person doing it is a Bad Person than doing Y.

[EDITED to add: Oh, and "actions that broadly resemble X tend to do greater harm to the world than actions that broadly resemble Y". And perhaps it's worth remarking that if you cash out "Bad Person" as "person liable to do net harm to the world", these three correspond to a typical consequentialist's analysis of consequentialism, virtue ethics, and deontology respectively. I am not claiming that this observation is in any way original.]