It would make me (and perhaps others) a happier person if people saying things like "it's worse to do X than Y" would distinguish between

• doing X is a greater harm to the world than doing Y, and
• doing X is better evidence that the person doing it is a Bad Person than doing Y.

[EDITED to add: Oh, and "actions that broadly resemble X tend to do greater harm to the world than actions that broadly resemble Y". And perhaps it's worth remarking that if you cash out "Bad Person" as "person liable to do net harm to the world", these three correspond to a typical consequentialist's analysis of consequentialism, virtue ethics, and deontology respectively. I am not claiming that this observation is in any way original.]