You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Stuart_Armstrong comments on Assessors that are hard to seduce - Less Wrong Discussion

5 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 09 March 2015 02:19PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (12)
Tags: seducing hacking assessing restriction risks

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 10 March 2015 02:36:56PM 0 points [-]

These can be defined in counterfactual ways, if needed. There need not actually be an assessor, just a small probability of one.

Comment author: Slider 11 March 2015 01:46:25AM 0 points [-]

Wouldn't that be the equivalent of thinking that a Pascal's wager will keep it in check?

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 11 March 2015 10:25:22AM 0 points [-]

No, because I'm using tricks like http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/ltf/false_thermodynamic_miracles/

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit