You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Dagon comments on Creating a satisficer - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 11 March 2015 03:03PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vaniver 23 March 2015 03:33:16PM 0 points [-]

The point here is that M(u-v) might not know what v is, but M(εu+v) certainly does, and this is not the same as maximising an unknown utility function.

Ah, okay. I think I see better what you're getting at. My intuition is that there's a mapping to minimization of a reasonable aggregation of the set of non-negative utilities, but I think I should actually work through some examples before I make any long comments.

Do you disagree with my description of the "resource gathering agent":

I don't think I had read that article until now, but no objections come to mind.

Comment author: Stuart_Armstrong 23 March 2015 03:35:36PM 0 points [-]

My intuition is that there's a mapping to minimization of a reasonable aggregation of the set of non-negative utilities

That would be useful to know, if you can find examples. Especially ones where all v and -v have the same probability (which is my current favourite requirement in this area).