You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Ruzeil comments on Examples of AI's behaving badly - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 16 July 2015 10:01AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (35)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Ruzeil 16 July 2015 12:32:51PM 2 points [-]

As I am interpreting this, the whole idea about the rewarding system(s) goes down the drain. The agent ,as humans always do, will find a way to cheat, because in (almost) every problem there is/are a loophole(s), which for sure can't be detected 100% upfront. As i see We can't use the same tools as evolution (the carrot and the stick) and expect to get something different then a creature as Us, with capacity In order of magnitudes bigger, of course.

Best Regards

Comment author: VoiceOfRa 21 July 2015 01:22:50AM 3 points [-]

One doesn't need to close 100% of the loopholes, only make it so exploiting them is harder than doing the work legitimately.