You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

MathiasZaman comments on Open thread, Mar. 16 - Mar. 22, 2015 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: MrMind 16 March 2015 08:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (302)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 March 2015 10:31:46AM 1 point [-]

On AI: are we sure we are not influenced by meta-religious ideas of sci-fi writers who write about sufficiently advanced computers just "waking up into consciousness" i.e. create a hard, almost soul-like, barrier between conscious and not conscious, which carries an assumption that consciousness is a typically human-like feature? It is meta-religious as it is based on the unique specialness of the human soul.

I mean I think the potential variation space of intelligent, conscious agents is very, very large and a randomly selected AI will not be human-like in way we would recognize it to. We will not recognize its consciousness, we will not recognize its intelligence, even its agency, all we would see it does mysterious complicated stuff we don't understand. It may almost look random. It does stuff, maybe it communicates with us although the human-language words it uses will not reflects its thought processes, but it will be profoundly alien.

Comment author: MathiasZaman 17 March 2015 11:33:10AM 4 points [-]

I think the thought-process of AI is expected to be alien by anyone who take AGI seriously. It's just not all that relevant to discussions about the threats and possibilities about it.