Vaniver comments on Psychological validity of the "Seven deadly sins"? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (26)
One of the most interesting sins in this context is "acedia," which is commonly misinterpreted as "laziness." It seems like "depression," seen by moderns as a psychological disorder, is a much closer concept.* If you asked a psychologist for the 'most common reasons people engage in self-defeating behavior,' they would likely start at a list of disorders, and depression typically tops the prevalence lists.
But it doesn't seem to me that other disorders match up well to the sins, or the sins to disorders. I'll also observe several of the sins seem positively approved of by much of modern culture. Capitalists are fans of greed as a drive, and the sex-positive are fans of lust as a drive.
*Wiki thinks this point is contentious, but I think the contention is only applicable if you get into the fine shades of things, not the coarse clusters.
Seligman gives acedia as the main understudied sexual disorder:
page 173 of What You Can Change and What You Can't by Seligman See also this summary