You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Vaniver comments on Psychological validity of the "Seven deadly sins"? - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: InquilineKea 17 March 2015 01:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (26)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Vaniver 17 March 2015 02:18:33AM *  5 points [-]

I'm curious: to what extent do the "seven deadly sins" cover the most common reasons why people engage in self-defeating behavior?

One of the most interesting sins in this context is "acedia," which is commonly misinterpreted as "laziness." It seems like "depression," seen by moderns as a psychological disorder, is a much closer concept.* If you asked a psychologist for the 'most common reasons people engage in self-defeating behavior,' they would likely start at a list of disorders, and depression typically tops the prevalence lists.

But it doesn't seem to me that other disorders match up well to the sins, or the sins to disorders. I'll also observe several of the sins seem positively approved of by much of modern culture. Capitalists are fans of greed as a drive, and the sex-positive are fans of lust as a drive.

*Wiki thinks this point is contentious, but I think the contention is only applicable if you get into the fine shades of things, not the coarse clusters.

Comment author: Gunnar_Zarncke 17 March 2015 10:04:14PM 2 points [-]

Seligman gives acedia as the main understudied sexual disorder:

The most mysterious and painful and costly sexual problem is "acedia," which means the waning of sexual attraction and passion between married couples as they age. Acedia is is both a physical torpor and the torpor of the soul. It is a sexual indifference that comes from familiarity. Acedia is a sexual disorder since it meets the defining criterion of a disorder, namely, it grossly imparis sexual, affectionate relations between two people who used to have them!

page 173 of What You Can Change and What You Can't by Seligman See also this summary