= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Clarity comments on Psychological validity of the "Seven deadly sins"? - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (26)
Can anyone think of a natural order for the different kinds of validity? I reckon that would be critical to even getting started on this question.
Remember, as the homepage says, rationality isn't about 'being able to answer any question'.
The important kinds of validity are:
If the seven deadly sins are a particular useful construct, I'd hypothesise that they could be mapped to the research domain criteria matrix. The same could be said about constructs like 'rationality'.