= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Gunnar_Zarncke comments on Personal Notes On Productivity (A categorization of various resources) - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (15)
I had difficulties understanding how to use and interpret your workflowy. I'd have liked an extract though this admittedly breaks live update,
Here's a link that gives directions on how to use workflowy if you've never used it before. As far as interpretation, what was unclear?
I'm not sure what you mean by this. What is an extract?
Most people cross-post article from their blogs more or less verbatim, but you just copied the head-lines which standing alone may make sense for you but not for everybody else.
I did this because if I just intended to look at the titles and go to the section that interested them. It's like posting the table of contents for a book. I could have edited it to display two levels of depth, but even that would have been quite long.
I agree there could be an issue with me using my own shorthand. But, I fell like if you looked at the sub-bullets of depth2 of any particular heading, that it would explain whatever shorthand I used in the heading. For example !shootDog has the sub-bullet "Book: Don't shoot the dog".
It made plenty of sense to me.