You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

taygetea comments on Michael Oakeshott's critique of something-he-called-rationalism - Less Wrong Discussion

-1 [deleted] 24 March 2015 09:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (17)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: taygetea 29 March 2015 02:03:46AM 0 points [-]

The entire point of "politics is the mind-killer" is that no, even here is not immune to tribalistic idea-warfare politics. The politics just get more complicated. And the stopgap solution until we figure out a way around that tendency, which doesn't appear reliably avoidable, is to sandbox the topic and keep it limited. You should have a high prior that a belief that you can be "strong" is Dunning-Kruger talking.

Comment author: [deleted] 30 March 2015 07:21:25AM 0 points [-]

You should have a high prior that a belief that you can be "strong" is Dunning-Kruger talking.

Okay, but feeling no passion, literally, no blood pressure rising isn't a strong evidence there with few false positives? Does it have many false positives?

Sandboxing is okay, better than total taboo, this is why I recommended a quarantine. Or a biweekly thread.